<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JFC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://countercritic.com/2008/04/10/jfc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://countercritic.com/2008/04/10/jfc/</link>
	<description>Keepin' it real.  Real ugly.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: countercritic</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2008/04/10/jfc/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>countercritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artzcritz.wordpress.com/?p=1021#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I've heard that too. She'll probably get "bought out" (read this article in Slate via Gawker: http://www.slate.com/id/2188417/pagenum/all/#page_start). Although, since The Times newsroom is technically on a "hiring freeze", there's no guarantee that they'll fill her position. 

The Times has yet to join the other newspapers that are simply slash-n-burning their corps of critics. Let's hope they have enough balls not to. After all, cutting critics' jobs hasn't raised readership OR advertising dollars. Instead, it's simply angered a lot of faithful, intelligent readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve heard that too. She&#8217;ll probably get &#8220;bought out&#8221; (read this article in Slate via Gawker: <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2188417/pagenum/all/#page_start" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2188417/pagenum/all/#page_start</a>). Although, since The Times newsroom is technically on a &#8220;hiring freeze&#8221;, there&#8217;s no guarantee that they&#8217;ll fill her position. </p>
<p>The Times has yet to join the other newspapers that are simply slash-n-burning their corps of critics. Let&#8217;s hope they have enough balls not to. After all, cutting critics&#8217; jobs hasn&#8217;t raised readership OR advertising dollars. Instead, it&#8217;s simply angered a lot of faithful, intelligent readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magpie</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2008/04/10/jfc/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>magpie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artzcritz.wordpress.com/?p=1021#comment-857</guid>
		<description>i heard that dunning is leaving the times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard that dunning is leaving the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
