<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some of them want to get used by you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing to get upset about &#171; countercritic</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nothing to get upset about &#171; countercritic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sportiness. But they don’t match the cool moderation of John Jasperse t-shirt creations for Misuse liable for prosecution, nor the flashy sportiness of David Neuman’s feedforward. They speak more to a cluttered, dingy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sportiness. But they don’t match the cool moderation of John Jasperse t-shirt creations for Misuse liable for prosecution, nor the flashy sportiness of David Neuman’s feedforward. They speak more to a cluttered, dingy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jowitt on Jasperse; And some elaboration on why talking about money in art is lame &#171; countercritic</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jowitt on Jasperse; And some elaboration on why talking about money in art is lame &#171; countercritic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] when I suggested that the effect of the opening monologue was &#8220;happily irrelevent,&#8221; I meant that any [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when I suggested that the effect of the opening monologue was &#8220;happily irrelevent,&#8221; I meant that any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countercritic</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[countercritic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Anna.  We really try to put our thinking cap on here at C.C.  And we have the time and space to really get into the nitty gritty.

Sometimes critics can get a little lazy or bored or who knows, like Dunning seemed to be the night she saw &quot;Misuse.&quot;  Hence the need for alternative criticism!  And if you&#039;re gonna pan something, you should at least dig your teeth into it.  &quot;Nothing very interesting happened&quot; is like a non observation.  It&#039;s not engaged.  It&#039;s not critical.  It&#039;s super passive.  Eeeew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Anna.  We really try to put our thinking cap on here at C.C.  And we have the time and space to really get into the nitty gritty.</p>
<p>Sometimes critics can get a little lazy or bored or who knows, like Dunning seemed to be the night she saw &#8220;Misuse.&#8221;  Hence the need for alternative criticism!  And if you&#8217;re gonna pan something, you should at least dig your teeth into it.  &#8220;Nothing very interesting happened&#8221; is like a non observation.  It&#8217;s not engaged.  It&#8217;s not critical.  It&#8217;s super passive.  Eeeew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Brady Nuse</title>
		<link>http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna Brady Nuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countercritic.com/2007/11/02/some-of-them-want-to-be-used-by-you/#comment-400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this in-depth review. I found it much more informative and resonate with my experience of the piece than Dunning&#039;s review. I liked many of the choreographic moments in this piece, and the mastery and innovation with the props was continually surprising and satisfying.

Thanks also for the comparison analysis with Jasperse&#039;s California, I didn&#039;t see that piece, but hearing about it now makes &quot;misuse&quot; even more meaningful in hindsite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this in-depth review. I found it much more informative and resonate with my experience of the piece than Dunning&#8217;s review. I liked many of the choreographic moments in this piece, and the mastery and innovation with the props was continually surprising and satisfying.</p>
<p>Thanks also for the comparison analysis with Jasperse&#8217;s California, I didn&#8217;t see that piece, but hearing about it now makes &#8220;misuse&#8221; even more meaningful in hindsite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

